• Home
  • About MMW
  • MMW Contributors
  • Resources

Jezebel and the Broken Jihad Record


Posted by sarayasin on 28 Nov 2011 / 0 Comment
Tweet



Following the lead of the always reliable Daily Mail, Jezebel recently published a post declaring how awful it is to call your child “Jihad,” suggesting that this is tantamount to naming a child “Hitler.”

Cassie Murdoch starts by drawing a parallel to the story of a New Jersey couple that named two of their children Adolf Hitler Campbell and  JoceLynn Aryan National Campbell. Murdoch links this case and with a Daily Mail story about a woman who named her baby Jihad, a word that Murdoch defines as a “religious war all followers are to wage against non-believers.” Murdoch’s quick-fire definition is not only inaccurate, it reeks of ignorance, and let’s face it: it’s just plain lazy.

Jihad is a word that many Muslims have wrestled with over the past ten years. It’s been misinterpreted, twisted, re-adjusted and scrutinised, and sometimes I get sicker of looking at those five letters than I am of the word hijab. Let us take a step back and regurgitate the first lesson from Not-All-Muslims-Are-Terrorists-101: jihad means struggle and not really the carnal holy war fantasy that keeps Pamela Geller aroused and awake at night. That isn’t to say that it cannot be used to describe something violent, but that it is complex and contested, much like any other religious word or figure. If you would like to beat a dead horse on the definition of jihad, please click here, or I don’t know: research any conversation about Islam in the past ten years.

The name “Jihad” signifies an important struggle to defend religion, or be a good Muslim, all things that would understandably be important to religious parents. And besides, Jihad is a really common name. And I mean, really common. In fact, I am sure that attendance records in our nations schools have featured that name for years, which might possibly be a sign of Shari’ah destroying our free and liberal society from within.

While I believe that it is important to be critical of Islam and any other religious institution, scrutiny through the lens of stereotypes is not a very good start, and I am disappointed to see a website that I held in such high regard perpetuate such stereotypes. Put down the Islamophobic sippy cups, Jezebel; a slow news day is never an excuse for pointless sensationalism.

 

Related Posts


Jezebel Turns Osama bin Laden’s Daughter into a Killing Machine
May 18, 2011


  • Find us on Facebook

  • Recent Posts

    • Film Review: 3 Seconds Divorce
    • The Intersections of Latinx Identities, Islam and Gendered Narratives
    • Book Review: The Tower by Shereen Malherbe
    • Taking Back the Narrative, One Panel at a Time
    • No Country For Travelling Women
  • Recent Comments

    • Mynaijabaze on Remembering Siti on Ramadan
    • Faye on Ramadan ~ Maybe Next Year
    • Shawn Smith on Ramadan ~ Maybe Next Year
    • aziza shaikh on Remembering the Quebec City Mosque Shooting, One Year Later
    • Mohammad shakoor on Saints and Misfits and Everything in Between
  • Authors

  • Archives

  • Categories